lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:26:07 -0500
From: Matthew Flaschen <matthew.flaschen@...ech.edu>
To: Raphael Marichez <falco@...too.org>,
full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [ GLSA 200611-08 ] RPM: Buffer overflow
Aren't RPMs meant to contain arbitrary code?
Matthew Flaschen
Raphael Marichez wrote:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> Synopsis
> ========
>
> RPM is vulnerable to a buffer overflow and possibly the execution of
> arbitrary code when opening specially crafted packages.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (251 bytes)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists