full-disclosure - Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <024101c70d25$ae07db50$4001a8c0@ngssoftware.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:29:48 -0000
From: "David Litchfield" <davidl@...software.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft

Hey all,
What started out as a fun project for me turned out some serious results -
"Which is more secure? Oracle vs Microsoft" is a paper I put together
looking at the number of security flaws in the Oracle and MS database
offerings. For those that are interested, you can grab a copy of the results
here: http://www.databasesecurity.com/dbsec/comparison.pdf
Cheers,
David 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/