full-disclosure - Re: GNU tar directory traversal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45647419.6010600@nolog.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:00:25 +0100
From: virus@...og.org
To: Siim Põder <windo@...rad-teel.net>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: GNU tar directory traversal

Hello,

Siim Põder wrote:
> That has little to do with the actual vulnerability, hasn't it? It's a
> possible workaround though, so that's great.

that's not a workaround. tar is supposed to overwrite files. If you 
don't want that behavior, use "-w".

>>> Discussing wether root should ever run tar is irrelevant.
>> Agreed, the discussion whether root should *run* tar or not is 
 > I specifically said I didn't want to discuss this

Yeah. So don't comment my comments...

GTi

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/