full-disclosure - Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <456AACE6.8098.2FAA3A92@nick.virus-l.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:16:22 +1300
From: Nick FitzGerald <nick@...us-l.demon.co.uk>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability

Tyop? wrote:

> Thinking that respect of standard is pathetic (netiquette here),
> will result in all communications, over internet or not,
> --> "noise".

And the history of F-D shows that F-D is expecially prone to this, this 
daylasoul moron being just the latest of a string of noise-only 
contributors.

Responsible list members in _any_ unmoderated list don't make the kind 
of content-free, response-generating posts our latest moron makes.

If she posts her inane pointless messages the amount of noise 
necessarily goes up.  If she doesn't make such posts she is therefore 
responsible for NOT making matters worse.

Her posting history shows that ALL she does is increase the noise 
level, so what should we decide about her?

The occasional noise post from an otherwise usually on-topic poster is 
tolerable, but noise-only posting from morons like daylasoul is not.

She should just shut the fuck up until she actually has something to 
say that is relevant to the list readership...

Regards,

Nick FitzGerald

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/