lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:49:14 -0500
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle@...il.com>
To: "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@...nehenge.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Nmap Online

On 01 Dec 2006 08:33:00 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@...nehenge.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "Dude" == Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle@...il.com> writes:
>
> Dude> Here is an example of what is legal vs what isnt: If you scan a
> Dude> machine with nmap from one machine, that is not illegal. If you run
> Dude> 100,00 nmap scans from a distributed botnet and take down their
> Dude> server, thats illegal.
>
> It's clear you're not a lawyer, and anyone who takes your advice here would be
> a fool.  But I just wanted to point that out again for the clueless.

so if you are disagreeing with one of the above statements, then one
of the following must be true in your opinion:

 you _can_ legally DoS someones server with 100,000 nmap scans
or
 It is illegal to portscan

learn to read buddy.

-JP

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists