[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e024ccca0612010945l316010eex7323a9761844eef4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:45:39 -0500
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle@...il.com>
To: "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@...nehenge.com>
Cc: Full-Disclosure mailing list <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Nmap Online
On 01 Dec 2006 09:36:58 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@...nehenge.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "Dude" == Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle@...il.com> writes:
>
> Dude> On 01 Dec 2006 08:54:23 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@...nehenge.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> If there's caselaw in Georgia, that's useful for Georgia, but
> >> certainly isn't referencable in the 49 other states.
>
> Dude> actually, it is. it is called legal precedence
>
> It wasn't clear from your posting that you were talking about a federal case.
well try reading the material I reference before saying that anyone
who listens to me is a fool next time plz.
> In that case, yes, it's caselaw. However, if it was just Georgia state law,
> that would *not* create case law for any other state.
>
> By the way, "caselaw" and "legal precedent" are the same.
thanks for the info, i learned something new today, which makes it a good day.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists