full-disclosure - Re: Microsoft Windows XP/2003/Vista memory corruption 0day

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20061222005808.2AA631D8F79@supertolla.itapac.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:58:19 +0100
From: "Michele Cicciotti" <mc@...msa.net>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows XP/2003/Vista memory
	corruption 0day

> Holy mackerel! Instances of this bug date back to 1999!

Different bug. That appears to be a trivial exhaustion of CSRSS worker threads through indiscriminate calls to MessageBox+MB_SERVICE_NOTIFICATION, which causes a DoS as no threads are available to serve kernel-mode requests from win32k, stalling GUI processes. I have done my fair share of CSRSS reversing in my better days, and I'm pretty sure that in Windows 2000 and later, a dedicated thread is used for such notifications, not just any thread, any time. Easily verifiable with local net sends and Spy++. It wasn't a "bug" either, more like a serious design flaw that ignored a very basic Win32 mantra ("don't do GUI in a worker thread") - not at all like this double-free

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/