full-disclosure - Re: SQID v0.2 - SQL Injection Digger.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f7ba524d0612261628y4a23cc05tf318fb7298cbe29a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 19:28:57 -0500
From: icecoldeuro@...il.com
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: SQID v0.2 - SQL Injection Digger.

So - hypothetically - the first result of the sample run at
sqid.rubyforge.org would only yield a Microsoft OLE DB provider error (Unclosed
quotation mark before the character string).

Now, granted, this is bad practice if they can't trap their errors, but I
also don't see how this constitutes proof of an XSS vulnerability. The usual
XSS variations - again, purely hypothetically - all just yield the same
error message.

Would you consider this a potential false positive then? In my opinion it's
not a vuln unless it's exploitable.

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/