[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200701031713.l03HDTpV010220@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:13:29 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Steve Clement <steve@...alhost.lu>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, phoenix.diablo@...glemail.com
Subject: Re: Google's blacklisted url database (phishing
url database)
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:58:55 +0100, Steve Clement said:
> As to whether the Blacklist should be public or not is up to personal
> believes. I for one think that it should be publicly available to have
> at least a good static reference of the most commonly used phishey sites...
There's no such thing as "most commonly used" - these things are ephemeral
and very much in the whack-a-mole variety. Last week's list is of almost
no help in telling you where this week's sites are, except when looked at
long-term trends you start to notice that some providers are lax on security
and as a result keep getting pwned.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists