[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <447682.93039.qm@web37215.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 01:24:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Rajesh Sethumadhavan <rajesh.sethumadhavan@...oo.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Google's blacklisted url database (phishing
url database)
http://sb.google.com/safebrowsing/update?versio=goog-black-url:1:0000
version info for each file:
---------------------------------------------------
[goog-black-enchash 1.15525]
[goog-black-url 1.7755]
[goog-sandbox-text 1.5]
[goog-white-domain 1.19]
[goog-white-url 1.371]
-----------------------------------------------------
interpolating "goog-sandbox-text" gives this URL:
http://sb.google.com/safebrowsing/update?version=goog-sandbox-text:1:7753
which sends:
------------------------------------------------
[goog-sandbox-text 1.5]
+sandbox function%20getHandlers%28%29%7Breturn%5B%5D%7D%0A%3B%0A%0A
------------------------------------------------
Oooh look, a hard-coded hash function. Paydirt ;)
http://sb.google.com/safebrowsing/update?version=goog-white-domain:1:7753
This one's presumably the white-listed domains:
moniker monikerd <monikerd@...il.com> wrote:
i see only two possible ways for google to get this kind of data.
google toolbar
or it buys/gets this information from some isp/companies/anybody with a big enough pipe ..
On 1/2/07, php0t <php0t@...ro.hu> wrote:
How exactly does such data get captured? Somebody placed a link
somewhere with the url having the user/password in it ? What would be
the point of that? And if not, where did that come from? I peeked at
http://www.google.com/tools/firefox/safebrowsing/faq.html to learn more
but it only has obvious info.
-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of JM
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 11:17 PM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure]Google's blacklisted url database
(phishing url database)
I just played around a bit with those lists and as it seems, Google did
a splendid job, even capturing some people's login data. Like here:
http://sb.google.com/safebrowsing/update?version=goog-black-url:1:7753
Regards,
J.M.
Professional Lurker
>[By] "Rajesh Sethumadhavan" < rajesh.sethumadhavan@...oo.com>
>[Date] Dienstag, 2. Januar 2007 18:42
>[To] full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
>[Subject] [Full-disclosure] Google's blacklisted url database (phishing
url
>database)
>
> It is possible to access google`s blacklisted url database ( phishing
> url database )
>
> http://sb.google.com/safebrowsing/update?version=goog-black-url:1:1
> http://sb.google.com/safebrowsing/update?version=goog-black-url:1:7998
>
> http://sb.google.com/safebrowsing/update?version=goog-white-domain:1:19
,goo
>g-white-url:1:371,goog-black-url:1:7693,goog-black-enchash:1:15282
>
>
> This database (Part of Google Safe Browsing) can be used in any
> anti-phishing commercial softwares :)
>
> Regards
> Rajesh Sethumadhavan
> http://www.xdisclose.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists