Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 01:50:58 -0500
From: <auto178855@...hmail.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>, <simon@...soft.com>
Subject: Re: iDefense Q-1 2007 Challenge -I WILL BUY FOR
	MORE

typical con artist - worng focus FUCKFACE

PROOF YOUR BONA FIDES VIA .LAWYER OR .ACCUNTANT. EVEN ONE NICKEL 
GIVEN FOR A VULN. LET ALONE 750 MILLION.

On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 01:42:43 -0500 Simon Smith <simon@...soft.com> 
wrote:
>Dumbass, you must be a part of the n3td3v ccr3w or something.
>
>How did you go from 75,000 to 750,000?
>
>
>On 1/19/07 1:38 AM, "auto178855@...hmail.com" 
><auto178855@...hmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Number one:
>> 
>> 1. An affidavit from your soliciters or accountant's that
>> USD750.000 has ever been dispensed through your company or your
>> proxy company
>> 
>> 2. An affidavit from your solictier's or accounttants, that you,
>> your so-called "client (who is you sno shit) have ever paid out
>> "upto" 750.ooo usd {citing in some cases}
>> 
>> PUT UP SHUT UP OR FUCK OFF. YOU COULDN'T FIND A VULN IF YOU 
>TRIED.
>> 
>> PROOF EVERY ONE WRONG LOUD MOUTH.
>> 
>> On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 01:31:51 -0500 Simon Smith 
><simon@...soft.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Dear NoBalls, 
>>>    What specifically is a "fuckface" anyway and why are you
>>> hiding behind
>>> an anonymous email account?
>>> 
>>> More importantly, my words were not:
>>> 
>>> "SAME TARGETS: ie7 VISTA 8k, I know someone who will pay much 
>for
>>> up
>>> to 75 for the same."
>>> 
>>> Hell that sentence doesn't even make any sense! What the heck 
>does
>> 
>>> "much for
>>> up to 75 for the same" even mean?
>>> 
>>> My EXACT words were:
>>> 
>>> "Amen!
>>>    KF is 100% on the money. I can arrange the legitimate 
>purchase
>> 
>>> of most
>>> working exploits for significantly more money than iDefense, In
>>> some cases
>>> over $75,000.00 per purchase. The company that I am working 
>with
>>> has a
>>> relationship with a legitimate buyer, all transactions are 
>legal.
>>> If you're
>>> interested contact me and we'll get the ball rolling.
>>> 
>>> -Simon
>>>   
>>> 
>>>    $8000.00 USD is low!"
>>> 
>>> -End of my words-
>>> 
>>> ;]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 1/19/07 1:05 AM, "auto178855@...hmail.com"
>>> <auto178855@...hmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> SAME TARGETS: ie7 VISTA 8k, I know someone who will pay much 
>for
>> 
>>> up
>>>> to 75 for the same. YOUR WORDS FUCKFACE
>>>> 
>>>> ST00PID LYING CUNT!
>>>> 
>>>> "I can arrange the legitimate purchase of most
>>>> working exploits for significantly more money than iDefense, 
>In
>>>> some cases 
>>>> over $75,000.00 per purchase."
>>>> 
>>>> """""""""" 
>>>> Re: [Full-disclosure] iDefense Q-1 2007 Challenge
>>>> 
>>>> From: Simon Smith (simonsnosoft.com)
>>>> Date: Tue Jan 16 2007 - 11:14:56 CST
>>>> know someone who will pay significantly more per vulnerability
>>>> against the 
>>>> same targets. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 1/10/07 12:27 PM, "contributor" <Contributoridefense.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1 
>>>>   
>>>> Also available at:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>http://labs.idefense.com/vcp/challenge.php#more_q1+2007%3A+vulnerab

>
>> 
>>> i
>>>> lity+chall 
>>>>> enge 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> *Challenge Focus: Remote Arbitrary Code Execution
>>> Vulnerabilities
>>>>> in 
>>>> Vista & IE 7.0*
>>>> 
>>>> "
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:43:50 -0500 Simon Smith
>>> <simon@...soft.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Nobody ever said that 75,000.00 was a price for a remote 
>vista
>>>>> bug.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 1/18/07 8:39 PM, "auto178855@...hmail.com"
>>>>> <auto178855@...hmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is complete bullshit nothing more than a social
>>> engineering
>>>>>> honey pot to get bugs and vulns for their own use, this
>>> company
>>>>>> couldn't affort 75.ooo USD if they tried, they cannot even
>>> find
>>>>>> their own bugs, they got 4 or 5 shitty "reasearch and vuln"
>>>>>> findings of thier own, that's it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 75.000 for a remote vista ie7 xploit, guaranteed you wont 
>find
>>>>> it
>>>>>> and if you do they won't pay
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> lose lose :(
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> jigga
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> yo
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure
>>> email,
>>>>> no account
>>>>>> required
>>>>>> http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail
>>>>>> https://www.hushssl.com?l=485
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-
>charter.html
>>>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure 
>email,
>>> no account
>>>> required
>>>> http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480
>>>> 
>>>> Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail
>>>> https://www.hushssl.com?l=485
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, 
>no account
>> required
>> http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480
>> 
>> Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail
>> https://www.hushssl.com?l=485
>>



Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required
http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480

Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail
https://www.hushssl.com?l=485

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists