full-disclosure - Re: Major gcc 4.1.1 and up security issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200701222251.l0MMpCNO019004@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:51:12 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Marcin Owsiany <marcin@...iany.pl>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Major gcc 4.1.1 and up security issue

On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:42:35 GMT, Marcin Owsiany said:
> Actually, I'm old enough to have programmed on 8-bit machines, but we're
> getting off-topic here :-)

That makes you a newbie.  The 16-bit PDP-11, and the 12-bit PDP-8, and all
the rest of those weird-size machines from DEC (18, 36 bit) and a lot of
other bizarre (by today's standards) designs date a good decade or more
before the Intel 8008 and other 8-bit microprocessors (6502, etc) showed up.

:)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/