full-disclosure - Re: flickr not truly private

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <739e7bb20702260656k86dba8dt76b3d5485dd1c73e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 06:56:19 -0800
From: "Line Noise" <300baud@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: flickr not truly private

On 2/25/07, John Duhuh <john.duhuh@...glemail.com> wrote:
> flickr say you can mark your photos private. when you look at the web
> interface maybe. just give the direct address of a picture to one with no
> access he grabs it no problem.
> google images tips left as an exercise.

Rest snipped. Of course they're not *private*, in that sense of the
word. Other than keeping web spiders from archiving your pictures, it
serves no purpose whatsoever. If you have pictures you don't want to
share with strangers, don't put them on Flickr.

Seems simple enough.

-- 
It's Full Disclosure.
Post the disclosure here, not on your website.
You may not have a web site tomorrow.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/