full-disclosure - Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ??

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <49E42B8E-6DBC-4B22-948A-41906C54C795@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:03:13 -0800
From: Andrew Farmer <andfarm@...il.com>
To: Scarlet Pimpernel <kishfellow@...oo.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ??

On 10 Mar 07, at 09:23, Scarlet Pimpernel wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> There is an undefined function in OWASP website's javascript code  
> (wikibits.js)
> called wgBreakFrames. This can cause potential damage to the site  
> if used maliciously.
>
...
> if (wgBreakFrames) {
...

First of all, that's a variable, not a function. Creating a function  
called "wgBreakFrames" wouldn't execute the function.

Second of all, I'm not really sure how that could be "used  
maliciously". If you're able to inject Javascript into the window  
context, you can already do whatever you like to the user's browser.  
So I'm not quite sure how this is supposed to "cause potential damage  
to the site".

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/