full-disclosure - Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ??

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <FED0E1EE2B744FA76072F743@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:44:23 -0600
From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@...allas.edu>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ??

--On March 10, 2007 11:37:25 PM -0500 Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
>
> Yeah, a 404 page controlled by the server might just be too chatty and
> give away info - but if you can control the input that creates the 404
> page, it gets more interesting...
>
You can't be serious.  I can "control" a server and "force" it to give me 
a 404 simply by typing in a page that doesn't exist.  You know - like 
http://www.vt.edu/bogus.html

Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

Content of type "application/pkcs7-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/