lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:44:44 +0300
From: "Nikolay Kichukov" <hijacker@...um.net>
To: "Aditya K Sood" <zeroknock@...aeye.org>,
	<full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: NewOrder.box.sk Inherits Severe
	RedirectionVulnerability

Hello Aditya,
I see your point there. Hope they get it fixed. Should the patch involve
some referrer checking?

Regards,
-Nikolay Kichukov

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Aditya K Sood" <zeroknock@...aeye.org>
To: "Nikolay Kichukov" <hijacker@...um.net>;
<full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] NewOrder.box.sk Inherits Severe
RedirectionVulnerability


> Nikolay Kichukov wrote:
> > Hello there,
> > I've read the article, but I still do not see where the severe
redirection
> > vulnerability is. Is this not a feature of the neworder.box.sk web site
to
> > allow anyone to be redirected to anypage they submit to redirect.php?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Nikolay Kichukov
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Aditya K Sood" <zeroknock@...aeye.org>
> > To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 8:49 PM
> > Subject: [Full-disclosure] NewOrder.box.sk Inherits Severe
> > RedirectionVulnerability
> >
> >
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Previous Rootkit.com Vulnerability have been patched.
> >> The neworder.box.sk is famous security website.It inherits very
specific
> >> redirection attacks. The domain forwarding or URL forwarding not only
> >> directly possible through the website but can be called from third
party
> >> directly.
> >>
> >> A very generic analysis have been undertaken based on search engine
> >> specification.Look into the issues at:
> >>
> >>
http://zeroknock.blogspot.com/2007/03/neworderboxsk-inherits-severe.html
> >> http://zeroknock.metaeye.org/analysis/neworder_red.xhtml
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Zeroknock
> >> http://zeroknock.metaeye.org/mlabs
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> Hi nikolay
>
>                        Thats where the thinking is bit off side.
> Remember there
> is lot of difference between redirection occurs from the main website
> through generating event and the redirection  that occurs from the third
> party.It will be okay to the feature context if the redirection supports
> only from the website.
>
> More precisely a search engine check is performed at the top to show
> that the page is not subjected as standard page for redirection. If its
> a feature than it must not be redirected from the third party.
>
> Thats All.
>
> Regards
> Adi
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists