[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F7AD7C2C-D74F-4B43-80E0-8A3FC195E7A5@digitalmunition.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:43:27 -0400
From: "Kevin Finisterre (lists)" <kf_lists@...italmunition.com>
To: "Giorgio Fedon" <giorgio.fedon@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Busting The Bluetooth Myth
Anyone wanna buy a used BPA100?
=]
-KF
On Apr 1, 2007, at 2:15 PM, Giorgio Fedon wrote:
> ----------------- To Thierry:
>
> > Oh, dear, here is my "thinly veiled advert" for you :
>
> > - You can potentially be sued for this (I would sue you,
> > see you are slandering a consultant here that gets jobs based
> > on his reputation)
>
> First of all I haven't said anything that could not be rebated.
> So I am not slandering anyone. I just said what I'm thinking at the
> moment;
> maybe Max Moser can make me change my mind.
>
> > you refer to ? I have read the paper and found none, where did you ?
>
> The software is described into detail inside the paper.
> Dongle activation, .ini files and .dcu files. This seems to run on
> Windows. I know only one software like this one (Maybe you are
> using it as well).
>
> > Where is he promoting Software Piracy ? I have read the paper
> and found none, where did you ?
>
> Those software are based upon a dongle (USB Bluetooth in this case).
> If you can clone the dongle, you could be able to easily clone the
> software.
>
> > First, I knew nothing about such a "release" until YOU posted
> information about the name
> > of a (what apparently is) a Warez group
>
> I'm sorry this was my mistake, but there wasn't any direct link to
> the release.
> Anyway I found this stuff after I have read the .pdf document. At
> first I have found the vendor
> then I have searched in google "Vendor + CSR dongle" and I found that.
>
> > Second, you apparently assume the Warez group is the same person
> that wrote the paper, which is
> > a very ignorant assumption to make, not to mention a dangerous one.
>
> I never told this.
>
> > The opensource community I think that is able to do it's own
> research without software piracy.
>
> Read it as not forcing (or partially forcing) the protection of
> commercial software.
>
>
> ----------------- To Anders:
>
> I agree with you
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists