[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46112CAC.4020801@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:17:48 +0100
From: "James (njan) Eaton-Lee" <james.mailing@...il.com>
To: Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: More information on ZERT patch for ANI 0day
Gadi Evron wrote:
> Although eEye has released a third-party patch that will prevent the
> latest exploit from working, it doesn't fix the flawed copy routine. It
> simply requires that any cursors loaded must reside within the Windows
> directory (typically C:\WINDOWS\ or C:\WINNT\). This approach should
> successfully mitigate most "drive-by's," but might be bypassed by an
> attacker with access to this directory.
I'm thinking that an attacker with write access to %systemroot% probably
has juicier, simpler targets to attack (which potentially let them run
code in a higher security context) than animated cursors.
- James.
--
James (njan) Eaton-Lee | UIN: 10807960 | http://www.jeremiad.org
"All at sea again / And now my hurricanes
Have brought down this ocean rain / To bathe me again"
https://www.bsrf.org.uk | ca: https://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=3
--
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (3521 bytes)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists