[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0704021410380.15368-100000@linuxbox.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 14:11:08 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org>
To: "James (njan) Eaton-Lee" <james.mailing@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: More information on ZERT patch for ANI 0day
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, James (njan) Eaton-Lee wrote:
> Gadi,
>
> Gadi Evron wrote:
>
> > For a real current attack.
>
> Understandably. This is the attack which this thread is about, as
> indicated in the subject line of the e-mail.
>
> To recap, you used the phrase "flawed copy routine." to refer to the
> fact that you could carry out an attack using this particular attack
> method by writing to "typically C:\WINDOWS\ or C:\WINNT\". Again, to
> recap, my point was:
>
> "an attacker with write access to %systemroot%
> probably has juicier, simpler targets to attack (which potentially let
> them run code in a higher security context) than animated cursors."
>
> Do you have any reply to make to what I actually *said*?
Not really, maybe othrs do.
>
> - James.
>
> --
> James (njan) Eaton-Lee | UIN: 10807960 | http://www.jeremiad.org
>
> "All at sea again / And now my hurricanes
> Have brought down this ocean rain / To bathe me again"
>
> https://www.bsrf.org.uk | ca: https://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=3
> --
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists