full-disclosure - Re: WEEPING FOR WEP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <28f529ba0704061322m6a74c749gc6b41f6812d6f15d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:22:13 -0700
From: "Mike Vasquez" <mike.vasquez@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: WEEPING FOR WEP

And traffic rate shouldn't be in the discussion either, since arp-replay
allows enough packets to be captured, on most home equipment, in about 20
minutes if you're unlucky, and attacking 128-bit wep.  64 bit keys can be
had in under 5 minutes, 128 in under 10, and all you have to do is be
connected for that length of time.

On 4/6/07, george_ou@...architect.net <george_ou@...architect.net> wrote:
>
> But WPA-PSK mode is even easier to use than WEP.  Why would you use WEP.
> Distance isn't really a problem with a pringle can antenna.
>
>
> George
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/