[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46426CC3.4070405@spaghetti.zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 01:52:19 +0100
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@...ix.org>
To: xsecurity@...driva.com
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [ MDKSA-2007:101 ] - Updated bind packages
fix vulnerability
security@...driva.com wrote:
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDKSA-2007:101
> http://www.mandriva.com/security/
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> Package : vim
> Date : May 9, 2007
> Affected: 2007.0, 2007.1
But the subject line reads:
[ MDKSA-2007:101 ] - Updated bind packages fix vulnerability
So is this a spoof or is this a spoof?
Or did somebody make a booboo at Mandriva. The PGP key seems to at least
check out for the fact that the signature on the part of the message
that is signed is correct. As the PGP key is not in the strong set it
can't be really trusted of course.
Greets,
Jeroen
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (312 bytes)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists