full-disclosure - Re: What RedHat doesn't want you to know about ExecShield (without NX)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:46:25 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: spender@...ecurity.net (Brad Spengler)
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, dailydave@...ts.immunitysec.com
Subject: Re: What RedHat doesn't want you to know about
	ExecShield (without NX)

On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:13:19 EDT, Brad Spengler said:

> Ingo knows about this (I mailed him privately about the problems I saw
> with Fedora Core 3, which resulted in an updated kernel -- though I

Dude, Fedora Core 3 was like 2 frikking years ago.  I suppose it's OK
for us to diss the grsecurity patch today because there were bugs in 2.1.5?
(I have a grsecurity-2.1.5-2.6.11.9-200505121617.patch.gz hanging around
which dates back to just about the same time as FC3 was released).

Now if you want to discuss the execshield implementation that's currently
shipping in FC6 or the about-to-escape FC7, we'll be more than happy to listen.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/