full-disclosure - Re: What RedHat doesn't want you to know about ExecShield (without NX)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070514213738.GA3298@grsecurity.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:37:39 -0400
From: spender@...ecurity.net (Brad Spengler)
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: What RedHat doesn't want you to know about
	ExecShield (without NX)

> Now if you want to discuss the execshield implementation that's 
> currently shipping in FC6 or the about-to-escape FC7, we'll be more 
> than happy to listen.

Hello hotshot,

In fact I was discussing the execshield implementation that's currently 
shipping in FC6 and the about-to-escape FC7, and you weren't more than 
happy to listen.  The comment about FC3 was in addition to the 
still-present issues I discussed and was mentioned in the same area 
since I noted the PIE binary non-determinism at the same time.
Maybe you should read first, and open your mouth afterwards.

-Brad

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/