full-disclosure - Re: Assorted browser vulnerabilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0706051359260.30342@dione>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:08:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...ne.ids.pl>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Assorted browser vulnerabilities

On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Michal Zalewski wrote:

> 1) Title    : MSIE page update race condition
>    Impact   : cookie stealing / setting, page hijacking, memory corruption
>    Demo     : http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/ierace/

Just FYI - my logs indicate that there is a fairly high percentage of
patterns consistent with successful exploitation among Safari users (about
20%).

For the non-vulnerable Firefox, this value is at 1% (for spoofed
User-Agent strings, random pranks, etc).

As such, the value for Safari seems significant, particularly since this
PoC is timing-dependent and fine-tuned for MSIE. I have no immediate way
to test it, but feel encouraged to explore this further.

/mz

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/