full-disclosure - Re: You shady bastards.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 14:31:44 -0400
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle@...il.com>
To: "Larry Seltzer" <Larry@...ryseltzer.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: You shady bastards.

On 6/6/07, Larry Seltzer <Larry@...ryseltzer.com> wrote:
> Why would this be offensive? It's a company address. Someone might send
> e-mail containing company business to the address.

Would you feel the same way if it was a voicemail left on his machine?
What about a postal letter addressed to the person?

All are means of communication, although vastly differing laws pertain
to each. I have always found this confusing. Why should the method I
use to convey personal messages be treated with such amazing leaps in
the levels of expected privacy?

Snail mail, (PSTN/GSM/mostVOIP)telephone calls, and emails are all
sent unencrypted (unless you consider the envelope a form of
encryption) IMO if you disagree with the companies rights to
open/listen to one form of communication, you should disagree with the
all of them.

-JP<who thinks its not only in bad taste, but shiesty to boot>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/