| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1184180010.30077.16.camel@localhost> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:53:30 -0400 From: Jim Popovitch <yahoo@...pop.com> To: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk> Subject: Re: Wachovia Bank website sends confidential information On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 12:03 -0400, Bob Bruen wrote: > While it is true that lots of folk pick on vendors for a few minutes of > fame, the Wachovia case is slightly different. > > They do have an attitude problem and are technically challenged. The basis > for this is a law enforcement conference about six months ago. During a > pressentation a Wachovia representative told a speaker to stop blaming the > banks for problems. This was the third presentation this individual has > listened to in which each speaker had blamed the banks for not doing > enough and the frustration level was a bit high. So you declare the whole of Wachovia technically challenged based on the one incident at a security conference (did all of Wachovia attend?) six months ago? Come on. ;-) Wachovia, like every other large enterprise, has good, mediocre, and bad employees. It's a fact of life, but not a news worthy story. I'm sure that some days the best and brightest represent Wachovia at some conference somewhere, and I am equally sure that some days the worst and most deplorable represent Wachovia at some conference somewhere. It happens. -Jim P. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists