| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <252277f40707140302u7975745m5a70e9f180e7fe46@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 05:02:54 -0500 From: "Martin Aberastegue" <xyborg@...il.com> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: Opera/Konqueror: data: URL scheme address bar spoofing > Ummmmm -- what part of "address bar spoofing" did you not understand? > > _IF_ the URL spoofing part of a URL spoofing vulnerability in one > browser does not work in another browser, then that other browser is > clearly NOT vulnerable to the first browser's URL spoofing > vulnerability. I understand that... > The issue Robert reported is NOT that Opera and Konqueror parse the > data: protocol, BUT that cunning use of a data: protocol URL can be > used to fool the user to think they're somewhere other than they are. > > As you so clearly -- and accurately -- say yourself, the URL spoofing > part of this does not work in FF, so we should give a rat's arse that > FF handles data: protocol URLs why? ok.. see this pic.. http://www.rzw.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/ff_spoof.jpg as you said.. "that cunning use of a data: protocol URL can be used to fool the user to think they're somewhere other than they are".. and now tell me that inexperienced users can't be confused if they saw something like that..., that's my point. -- Martin Aberastegue http://www.rzw.com.ar _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists