[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <994101115.20070724220715@SECURITY.NNOV.RU>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:07:15 +0400
From: 3APA3A <3APA3A@...URITY.NNOV.RU>
To: jason@...lerinterviews.com
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Signal to Noise Ratio
Dear jason@...lerinterviews.com,
--Tuesday, July 24, 2007, 5:02:16 PM, you wrote to full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk:
jkc> It seems to me the average SNR here could be greatly improved with any
jkc> one of several commonly available "community-based" filtering
jkc> mechanisms. Digg and Slashdot are both examples of what I'm suggesting.
This subject arises here twice an year. List needs _professional_
moderation, like Bugtraq has. because:
1. Next thing to research will be attacks against community-based
filtering mechanisms.
2. No, thanks, see enough "community moderators" things with Wikipedia,
where sense of good always hits common sense. It's well known who has
high desire to moderate: not a professional with deep topic knowledge.
Michael Zalewski was filtered from "hackers" for few years for
self-promotion (Was it Stallman who edited this article or 15-year
schoolboy who read nothing but few articles about... let me remember..
Melissa worm?). Bad for you, Michael, you promote yourself again! I was
not able to add article about free open source software, as I am only
listed software developer (I really am): it's promotion. Just wonder: if
somebody looks for specific software in Wikipedia, is it better to have
potentially promotional article from it's developer or do not have
article at all?
--
~/ZARAZA http://securityvulns.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists