[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AA8E89377DCB1C498CF19E343CA49D8E23EBC3@NYEXCHSVR01.texpac.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:23:08 -0400
From: "Fetch, Brandon" <bfetch@....com>
To: <joey.mengele@...hmail.com>, <jason@...lerinterviews.com>,
<3apa3a@...urity.nnov.ru>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Signal to Noise Ratio
*reaches for the raincoat for the pending continued pissing match*
Anyone have waterproof popcorn?
-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Joey
Mengele
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 2:15 PM
To: jason@...lerinterviews.com; 3apa3a@...urity.nnov.ru
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Signal to Noise Ratio
This is an English speaking list. Please translate.
Grow up.
J
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:07:15 -0400 3APA3A <3APA3A@...URITY.NNOV.RU>
wrote:
>Dear jason@...lerinterviews.com,
>
>--Tuesday, July 24, 2007, 5:02:16 PM, you wrote to full-
>disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk:
>
>jkc> It seems to me the average SNR here could be greatly
>improved with any
>jkc> one of several commonly available "community-based" filtering
>jkc> mechanisms. Digg and Slashdot are both examples of what I'm
>suggesting.
>
>This subject arises here twice an year. List needs
>_professional_
>moderation, like Bugtraq has. because:
>
>1. Next thing to research will be attacks against community-
>based
>filtering mechanisms.
>
>2. No, thanks, see enough "community moderators" things with
>Wikipedia,
>where sense of good always hits common sense. It's well known
>who has
>high desire to moderate: not a professional with deep topic
>knowledge.
>Michael Zalewski was filtered from "hackers" for few
>years for
>self-promotion (Was it Stallman who edited this article or
>15-year
>schoolboy who read nothing but few articles about... let me
>remember..
>Melissa worm?). Bad for you, Michael, you promote yourself again!
>I was
>not able to add article about free open source software, as I
>am only
>listed software developer (I really am): it's promotion. Just
>wonder: if
>somebody looks for specific software in Wikipedia, is it better
>to have
>potentially promotional article from it's developer or do
>not have
>article at all?
>
>
>--
>~/ZARAZA http://securityvulns.com/
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
--
HASH(0x8be1f18)
HASH(0x8be1b7c)
http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4d80lgEQMbVvsFVcKkzEfbdfzp47Z5fwJxD
QcDnCBZDZBYvu/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
This message is intended only for the person(s) to which it is addressed
and may contain privileged, confidential and/or insider information.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
Any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action concerning
the contents of this message and any attachment(s) by anyone other
than the named recipient(s) is strictly prohibited.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists