full-disclosure - Re: Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 29, Issue 51

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:27:06 +0200
From: shadown <shadown@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 29, Issue 51

Dear List,

Please don't do more paranoia about my mail.
YES, it was my mistake, ok? I'm human after all as you all are too. This
is not my first mistake and it won't be the last for sure either.
I ask for apologies for the inconvenient caused by my mistake.

Cheers,
  Sergio

full-disclosure-request@...ts.grok.org.uk wrote:
> Send Full-Disclosure mailing list submissions to
> 	full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://lists.grok.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	full-disclosure-request@...ts.grok.org.uk
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	full-disclosure-owner@...ts.grok.org.uk
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Full-Disclosure digest..."
> 
> 
> Note to digest recipients - when replying to digest posts, please trim your post appropriately. Thank you.
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Hash (Peter Besenbruch)
>    2. Re: Hash (Tremaine Lea)
>    3. Re: Hash (gjgowey@....blackberry.net)
>    4. Re: Hash (Tremaine Lea)
>    5. Re: Hash (Joey Mengele)
>    6. Re: Hash (Dee??n Chakravarth?)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:52:15 -1000
> From: Peter Besenbruch <prb@...a.net>
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Hash
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Message-ID: <46A95DDF.5050806@...a.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Tremaine Lea wrote:
>> Sure, it's possible.  Possibly Sergio is lazy.  As he sent it via  
>> gmail's auth smtp servers and not from webmail, it's just as possible  
>> it happened in his mail client.
> 
> And he still could have, and should have edited it.
> 
>> And all of that aside, who cares?  We see signatures like that all  
>> the time on mailing lists.  It's pretty obvious they're useless in  
>> this context.
> 
> Useless in any context. Sigs. like that are very unprofessional. Even if 
> I know they are nonsense, such disclaimers come across as mildly bullying.
> 

-- 
Sergio Alvarez
Security, Research & Development
IT Security Consultant
email: shadown@...il.com

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives