full-disclosure - Re: Hash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:52:15 -1000
From: Peter Besenbruch <prb@...a.net>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Hash

Tremaine Lea wrote:
> Sure, it's possible.  Possibly Sergio is lazy.  As he sent it via  
> gmail's auth smtp servers and not from webmail, it's just as possible  
> it happened in his mail client.

And he still could have, and should have edited it.

> And all of that aside, who cares?  We see signatures like that all  
> the time on mailing lists.  It's pretty obvious they're useless in  
> this context.

Useless in any context. Sigs. like that are very unprofessional. Even if 
I know they are nonsense, such disclaimers come across as mildly bullying.

-- 
Hawaiian Astronomical Society: http://www.hawastsoc.org
HAS Deepsky Atlas: http://www.hawastsoc.org/deepsky

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/