full-disclosure - Re: SecNiche : Microsoft Internet Explorer Pop up Blocker Bypassing and Dos Vulner

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.51.0708151659160.14263@faron.mitre.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:10:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
To: security curmudgeon <jericho@...rition.org>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
	"Steven M. Christey" <coley@...re.org>, websecurity@...appsec.org
Subject: Re: SecNiche : Microsoft Internet Explorer Pop up
 Blocker Bypassing and Dos Vulner

On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, security curmudgeon wrote:

> OSVDB did not begin agressively tracking and cataloging myth/fake
> vulnerabilities until earlier this year.

CVE began a similar practice by using a "** DISPUTED **" or "** REJECT **"
string in the descriptions.

> OSVDB will add legitimate vulnerabilities before myth/fake typically, so
> in some cases they are just at the bottom of the queue.

Same with CVE; so if we've determined that a researcher has a very bad
track record, we'll de-prioritize them on our queue.  We don't keep a
specific list of reliable/unreliable researchers, however.  A resource
like that would be very useful.  Some unreliable researchers do improve,
however.

- Steve

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/