full-disclosure - Re: Unreal: a movement to block Firefox

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46E6BB20.7040806@mistrealm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:58:24 -0400
From: mbs <mbs@...trealm.com>
To: micheal.espinola@...il.com
Cc: Full-Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Unreal: a movement to block Firefox

The whole concept of blocking 12.41% of Internet users (see 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers ) seems 
laughable, and a bad idea.

What I don't find amusing is Chris Soghoian's statement "Users of 
advertisement skipping technology are essentially engaged in theft of 
resources".

I don't know about anyone else, but I happen to pay for my internet 
access. If I choose not to waste my bandwidth (and my time) with 
unwanted content, I would suggest that is my right.

Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
> http://whyfirefoxisblocked.com/
>
> http://www.cnet.com/8301-13739_1-9770502-46.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/