[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46E6AD30.3060509@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:58:56 +0200
From: monikerd <monikerd@...il.com>
To: micheal.espinola@...il.com
Cc: Full-Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Unreal: a movement to block Firefox
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
> http://whyfirefoxisblocked.com/
>
> http://www.cnet.com/8301-13739_1-9770502-46.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5
>
>
This already a bit old.
It's a fine way of thinking in circles
firfox->add block extention ->don't generate revenue -> block all
firefox users\
\--------------------------------------------------|
This dimwit claims it isn't a problem because these "firefox" users are
geeky opensource
people that don't buy much online anyway.
Hence why bother to block them?
He just has some problems with the add block developers who don't want
to facilitate him
in bypassing the software.
Which is (i'll share a secret) is possible.
he's this duchebag who thinks he's all the rage. Fine. Whatever he can
have his site
there is even an whyisfirefoxblocked.com
block 20% of all Europeans is bound to be great for business.
All the other browsers opera, IE have these features too. the firefox
plugin has regular expressions,
O no firefox is just to evil.
It's not even worth mentioning
and firefox users can also install the User Agent plugin to bypass the
script that he has put up on
his rediculous page.
When this hit digg, all his webpages were down for days I bet he's still
paying for the bandwith
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists