[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F41A58.5070403@infiltrated.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:24:08 -0400
From: "J. Oquendo" <sil@...iltrated.net>
To: Casper.Dik@....COM
Cc: Crispin Cowan <crispin@...ell.com>, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
bugtraq@...urityfocus.com,
"pdp \(architect\)" <pdp.gnucitizen@...glemail.com>,
Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org>
Subject: Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows
Casper.Dik@....COM wrote:
> But a "0 day vulnerability" is meaningless as a definition; it applies to
> a vulnerability for exactly 24 hours and then is meaningless. ALL
> vulnerabilities were discovered at some point and had their 24 hours of
> "0 day fame" by your definition. It just does not make sense.
>
> Casper
>
Should we now create a new term for the industry +0day or 1day. How
about? nowaday
--
====================================================
J. Oquendo
"Excusatio non petita, accusatio manifesta"
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF684C42E
sil . infiltrated @ net http://www.infiltrated.net
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5157 bytes)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists