Message-ID: <e024ccca0709241418j26d7fd99j5bfcdde1af1bd922@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:18:43 -0400
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle@...il.com>
To: "Richard Golodner" <rgolodner@...ratection.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Gadi Evron strikes again

On 9/22/07, Richard Golodner <rgolodner@...ratection.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> WoriedSecurity said"blah, blah, nothing".
>
> Do you know Gadi? Have you ever corresponded with him? He adds some valuable
> knowledge to a legitimate issue that most Service Providers down to the home
> user should be aware of.
>
> I read the "serious 0-day" thread and I think you are just pissed off. If
> you had some balls you would use your real name like most legitimate
> networkers do instead of hiding behind a pseudonym.
>
> Check Gadi's work and see for yourself instead of letting your hurt feelings
> get in the way. Talk about script kiddies. Jesus man, are you sure you real
> name is not n3td3v?

Actually, if you check the posts on funsec from exploitable@...il, it
is his real name, and the same guy posting.. Just like gobbles :-P

-JP

I do not see anyone soliciting your opinion about
> anything. What have you contributed to the body of knowledge? All I read is
> juvenile BS. Mail from WorriedSecurity now gets dumped before it even sees
> my mail client.
>
>             Thanks for making it clear that you're an ass.
>
> Richard Golodner
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
>
>
> From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
> [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On
> Behalf Of worried security
>  Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 9:11 AM
>  To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
>  Subject: [Full-disclosure] Gadi Evron strikes again
>
>
>
>
>
> Who seen Gadi Evron on the mailing lists trolling about what a 0day is and
> what a 0day isn't, in the middle of a serious disclosure about a PDF flaw?
>
>
>
>
>
> Hilarious.
>
>
>
>
>
> Well, just incase you missed it, here it is again...
>
>
>
>
>
> http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2007/Sep/0229.html
>
>
>
>
>
> And this guy wants to be a high profile guy at the forefront of information
> security discussion?
>
>
>
>
>
> lolzers.
>
>
>
>
>
> Script kiddos unite behind the big man Evron.
>
>
>
>
>
> He leads, where the rest of us follow.
>
>
>
>
>
> And he comes on the lists complaining people are mimicing his e-mail
> addresses and calling him a dick. *I wonder why?*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Its funny, he strongly keeps an eye on Funsec mailing list and keeps
> everyone in check,Yet, he has a total disregard for "quality control" else
> where, especially on Bugtraq!!!!!!!!
>
>
>
>
>
> My question is "Who is Gadi Evron?".
>
>
>
>
>
> This guy you would think would add something special to a discussion, but he
> doesn't, and you know what I know his excuse is? He is keeping his knowledge
> secret so bad guys can't learn from his knowledge.
>
>
>
>
>
> lolzers Gadi Evron.
>
>
>
>
>
> The truth is, Gadi just wants to make sure his name and e-mail address is in
> every major flaw disclosure, no matter how lame the comment is, just as long
> as his name and e-mail is in high profile disclosures, then Gadi Evron can
> sleep at night.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks Gadi!!! My hero.
>
>
>
>
>
> Bugtraq is moderated for a reason, so Bugtraq moderators, start moderating
> it!!! Symantec arsewipes.
>
>
>
>
>
> Securityfocus, no really, why are you allowing Gadi Evron troll on such a
> high profile respected moderated list? Gadi's comment mentioned above was a
> true breach of the rules, so start moderating his comments more in future.
>
>
>
>
>
> Leave the trolling for F-D Gadi, Bugtraq readers don't want to see your shit
> in future, and Bugtraq moderators, actually read what Gadi Evron is posting
> in future, instead of just reading the name and sender and approving the
> message without actually reading the body.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Oh its Gadi, its automatically approved*
>
>
>
>
>
> Lets look at Bugtraq's description:
>
>
>
>
>
> "BugTraq is a full disclosure moderated mailing list for the *detailed*
> discussion and announcement of computer security vulnerabilities: what they
> are, how to exploit them, and how to fix them. "
> http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/description#0.1.1
>
>
>
>
>
> lolzers, Bugtraq moderators don't read thier own shit or inforce it!
>
>
>
>
>
> Someone snip a bit of that description that gives Gadi right of way to troll
> on Bugtraq in the middle of serious flaw disclosures!!!!!
>
>
>
>
>
> Gadi, seriously f**king learn about the stuff you read , so you can actually
> input into the threads and help with the topic infront of you, instead of
> random off-topic messages about what defines a 0-day and what doesn't.
>
>
>
>
>
> Why didn't you start your own thread on Bugtraq about "what is a 0-day?",
> because they wouldn't let you!!!! Instead you sneak your shit into high
> profile threads, to get a name for yourself.
>
>
>
>
>
> Your conversation, as always Gadi, is best suited for Full-Disclosure or
> security-basics, so get the f*** off Bugtraq you idiot.
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter:
> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists