[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11e1d1550709280859i5a5adc1et235ad412126e1d6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:59:30 -0400
From: Epic <epic@...k3r.com>
To: Troy <gimmespam@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: New term "RDV" is born
How about SPB - (Stupid Pointless Bullshit)
The noise level on this list is pathetic anymore....
On 9/28/07, Troy <gimmespam@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Wouldn't UDV be more appropriate, for unpatched disclosed vulnerability?
> The "R" in RDV means recent. I wouldn't consider a two-month old, but still
> unpatched, vulnerability to be recent, so I wouldn't really be able to call
> it an RDV. I would, however, be able to call it a UDV.
>
> Another option would be EDV, for exploitable disclosed vulnerability, or
> even just UV or EV. Why do we need to bring up the point that it's
> disclosed? How could we be discussing an undisclosed vulnerability?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists