full-disclosure - Re: New term "RDV" is born

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:29:51 +0100
From: "worried security" <worriedsecurity@...glemail.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: New term "RDV" is born

On 9/28/07, Troy <gimmespam@...il.com> wrote:
>
>   Wouldn't UDV be more appropriate, for unpatched disclosed vulnerability?
> > The "R" in RDV means recent. I wouldn't consider a two-month old, but still
> > unpatched, vulnerability to be recent, so I wouldn't really be able to call
> > it an RDV. I would, however, be able to call it a UDV.
> >
>
> Another option would be EDV, for exploitable disclosed vulnerability, or
> even just UV or EV. Why do we need to bring up the point that it's
> disclosed? How could we be discussing an undisclosed vulnerability?
>

Two months is still recently. Think about "In recent history we invaded
Iraq", "In recent times terrorism has become more prominent".

Five, Ten years can still be classed as recently. Two months, no problem.

Dude, I sat for hours thinking up RDV, give me some credit ;)

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/