[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67ea64530709281031w3c09fb60i48a250dc4749fd03@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:31:53 +0100
From: "worried security" <worriedsecurity@...glemail.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: New term "RDV" is born
On 9/28/07, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:29:51 BST, worried security said:
>
> > Two months is still recently. Think about "In recent history we invaded
> > Iraq", "In recent times terrorism has become more prominent".
>
> The real problem here is that "0-day" originally meant "previously
> undisclosed
> vulnerability/exploit". The term lost its usefulness when all the hacker
> wannabe's started posting "I found a 0-day", when what they really had was
> a "*yawn*-we've-been-waiting-18-months-for-vendor-to-fix-day".
Yes, Valdis, and thats why a new modern term for 0-day is needed. Forget
0-day, its the past, RDV is the future.
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists