[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <985b1a3d0709301241r67ee962crc3abcca8d80ff919@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:41:52 +0200
From: "Guasconi Vincent" <tyoptyop@...il.com>
To: "Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: New term "RDV" is born
On 9/28/07, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:29:51 BST, worried security said:
>
> > Two months is still recently. Think about "In recent history we invaded
> > Iraq", "In recent times terrorism has become more prominent".
>
> The real problem here is that "0-day" originally meant "previously undisclosed
> vulnerability/exploit". The term lost its usefulness when all the hacker
> wannabe's started posting "I found a 0-day", when what they really had was
> a "*yawn*-we've-been-waiting-18-months-for-vendor-to-fix-day".
Yes, it's a YWVBW18MFVTF-day. I know that.
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/YWVBW18MFVTF-day
--
Guasconi Vincent
Etudiant.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists