[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <47002EF8.4945.3F162DEA@nick.virus-l.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:19:20 +1300
From: Nick FitzGerald <nick@...us-l.demon.co.uk>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Testing DidTheyReadIt.com
Juha-Matti Laurio to Thierry Zoller:
[un-top-posted]
> > Just a sample test of how many of you read this email. Let's see how
> > good it performs for mailinglists and what comes out.
>
> Your headers etc. doesn't state that this service is in use.
Maybe not _directly_, but comparing Received: headers in other Email
Thierry has sent to Full-Disclosure from his @Zoller.lu address, you
quickly see that hyperion.vo.lu is usually (??) the machine that
injects such messages into the mail chain, whereas "his" test message
was injected by colibri.e-mail-servers.com
Aside from being totally useless "against" those who use text-only
MUAs, this kind of service is generally useless because increasingly,
even vendors like MS realize that user privacy is actually somewhat
important and increasingly make NOT retrieving remote images (and other
content) in "rich text" Emails the default, rather than just providing
an option to turn off such attrocities should the user be aware enough
to go looking for such an option...
This is an example of a service that, in general, should not work, and
in future will be increasingly more useless, I think.
In the meantime, all (???) those using it should be asking what kind of
data leakage they are exposing themselves to, through possible message
content scanning and sender/receiver address usage patterns, among
others.
Regards,
Nick FitzGerald
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists