full-disclosure - Re: Technology and your Security Program

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <40ecb01f0710120405w65db29d2w33903a2aff902805@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:05:14 -0400
From: "Paul Melson" <pmelson@...il.com>
To: "Kelly Robinson" <caliana1989@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Technology and your Security Program

On 10/12/07, Kelly Robinson <caliana1989@...il.com> wrote:
> Why should technology be the final tier to be fully implemented in a
> security program?
>
> I am thinking in terms of the Digital Liability Management model:
> http://daemonic.wordpress.com/2006/04/26/it-security/

Is this a trick question?

If you buy product first, you will find yourself changing policy and
accepting otherwise unnecessary risk or expense (or both) in order to
retrofit your policy to your technology.  In other words, you're
letting the tail wag the dog.

PaulM

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/