[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f6cb7b40710231711k1a61c080yddc954305724dc6a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:11:40 -0500
From: nocfed <nocfed@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Distributed SSH username/password brute
forceattack
On 10/22/07, Anders B Jansson <hdw@...listi.se> wrote:
> A.L.M.Buxey@...ro.ac.uk wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Oct 22 20:36:13 nms sshd[90657]: Failed password for invalid user gopher
> >> from 77.46.152.2 port 55120 ssh2
> >
> > user/password authentication for SSH? one way of cleaning up your
> > logs and killing this type of attack is to reconfigure your OpenSSH
> > to only allow key based logins. stopped my 10M+ logfiles straight away
>
> An even better way is to punt the attackers to a 'silent drop' table in your firewall.
>
> Cuts your logs to nothing and keeps the kiddies wasting their time.
>
> The latest attack surge is either directed or a bit more clever, haven't seen anything on my random user DSL traps.
> --
> // hdw
>
I still say to throw them into a TARPIT table and tag their
connections to throw them into a nice TCP window size of 0. Currently
I lower unknown connections window size to bring them to a crawl while
known ranges immediately go through. It's not about blocking all
unknown, but about making the process take up more of their resources.
A silent drop will take up very little of the worm's time when
compared to a tarpit that can eat up minutes(hours if they do not set
timeouts) per connection.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists