[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19478.1193868507@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:08:27 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: reepex <reepex@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Flash that simulates virus scan
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:56:20 CDT, reepex said:
> resulting to se in a pen test cuz you cant break any of the actual machines?
Lots of *actual* compromises happen the same exact way - resorting to SE.
As such, if a pen test doesn't cover the same territory, it's incomplete.
"Yes, your house is secure - we checked all the doors and they're up to snuff.
We however didn't check if you'll open the door *anyhow* if the landshark on
the other side says 'Landshark', leading to everybody getting eaten."
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists