[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ef5fec60712152329q11760c91j1d0b1bdebd922c73@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 23:29:07 -0800
From: coderman <coderman@...il.com>
To: "Gobbles is back" <isbackgobbles@...glemail.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Thomas Ptacek and Wikipedia
On Dec 15, 2007 2:51 PM, coderman <coderman@...il.com> wrote:
> ... "I don't think this is a timing attack; it's a side-channel
> attack that exploits the fact that OpenSSL's impact on the branch
> prediction cache leaks information."
someone says to me, "Branch Prediction Analysis side channel attacks
are not traditional timing attacks".
sure, not _traditional_ timing attack. active interference for
targeted misses gives much more key than traditional passive timing.
but this is still a timing attack, even if one much more effective
than most. someone is now informed.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists