full-disclosure - Re: AOL YGP Picture Editor YGPPicEdit.dll Multiple Buffer Overflows

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e9d9d4020712271035k36af36e1xbe39f987e2d392d5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 12:35:46 -0600
From: reepex <reepex@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: AOL YGP Picture Editor YGPPicEdit.dll
	Multiple Buffer Overflows

I believe I have contributed greatly to the security community with my post
here. Not only have I denied another 0x41414141 hacker but I have also made
Valdis have to backtrack on his ( as usual) stupid post. I believe Valdis
and Billy O Reilly have alot in common. ( "
"I was wrong. I am not pleased about it at all and I think all Americans
should be concerned about this…What do you want me to do, go over and kiss
the camera?" ).

On Dec 27, 2007 9:05 AM, Elazar Broad <elazarb@...thlink.net> wrote:

> After some more analysis by Carsten Eiram @ Secunia, this is NOT
> exploitable. I would like to apologize for the hasty post. SecurityFocus,
> please update bid 27026 to reflect the fact that at most, this can just
> crash the browser.
>
> Elazar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
> >Sent: Dec 26, 2007 1:28 AM
> >To: reepex <reepex@...il.com>
> >Cc: Elazar Broad <elazarb@...thlink.net>,
> full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> >Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] AOL YGP Picture Editor YGPPicEdit.dllMultiple Buffer Overflows
> >
> >On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 21:53:29 CST, reepex said:
> >
> >> How does a bunch of 'A's prove something is exploitable?
> >
> >If a bunch of A's causes the EIP to end up as x'41414141', it's 95% of
> the
> >way to being an exploit.  If it gets you some *other* crash, it's
> probably
> >at least 30% to 40% of the way to an exploit.
> >
> >Go back and read the analysis of the NTP buffer overflow from a number of
> years
> >back.  Truly a classic - they managed to leverage a *one byte* overflow
> into
> >a complete and total rooting of the box.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/