[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <997ef2c20801211025gfb851c9w6e40396b5e45013c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:25:09 -0600
From: "Nate McFeters" <nate.mcfeters@...il.com>
To: "J. Oquendo" <sil@...iltrated.net>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Professional IT Security Providers -
Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F )
eW91IGNhbiBwYXkgdXMgdG8gd2hvcmUgeW91ciBjb21wYW55Cg==
The interesting thing is that they don't seem to be reviewing large
companies... perhaps they are interested in extorting the smaller ones???
Just a thought, not an accusation.
Nate
On 1/21/08, J. Oquendo <sil@...iltrated.net> wrote:
>
> SecReview wrote:
> > Nate,
> > Your email was constructive and much appreciated. We'll go over
> > the review a second time and incorporate some of your suggestions.
> > Thank you for taking the time to provide so much good feedback.
> >
>
> Hey all, I'd like to get into reviewing security companies as well.
> Before I do though I'd appreciate it if someone could provide me
> with information on the differences betweens statistical sampling
> over judgmental sampling. I wouldn't want to write a review that
> could affect someone's livelihood without knowing what the differences
> are between say change management and mitigation management.
>
> And to the older security folks on the list keeping quiet (not those
> between the ages of tenteen and 19):
>
> eW91IGNhbiBwYXkgdXMgdG8gd2hvcmUgeW91ciBjb21wYW55Cg==
>
> Cheap too!
>
>
>
> --
> ====================================================
> J. Oquendo
>
> SGFA #579 (FW+VPN v4.1)
> SGFE #574 (FW+VPN v4.1)
>
> wget -qO - www.infiltrated.net/sig|perl
>
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF684C42E
>
>
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists