full-disclosure - Re: Prominent lack of scientology ubershit on FD?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 07:30:14 +0000
From: "worried security" <worriedsecurity@...glemail.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Prominent lack of scientology ubershit on FD?

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 07:07:17 00100 (CET), cos <cos@...lvault.com> wrote:
> WTF. I'm disappointed.
>
> Yours,
> CoS - PDPoS - CISP
> https://www.scientology.org/ (c) 2176 DC

International hackers don't care about this.

Of course we monitor the situation closely but we aren't about to get
involved in it.

DDoS'ing some cult website, is so lame its laughable you guys even
bothered to start.

Going after weak targets, whats the point?

I'm more likely to want to go and dismantle your bot net, machine by
machine than to find it a challenge to DDoS the scientology website.

Real hackers are in things for the challenge, show me where the
challenge is at in this.

Regards,

n3td3v

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/