[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20D3ABB4974D954F9264E414F966AF34013198C1@C12-E2K3-MBOX03.cnet.cnwk>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:18:13 -0800
From: "George Ou" <george.ou@...hrepublic.com>
To: "JxT" <jxt.lists@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Cisco and Vocera wireless LAN VoIP devices
don't check certificates
No, the source is VERY good. They just don't admit it openly on their
website like Vocera's documentation.
________________________________
From: JxT [mailto:jxt.lists@...il.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:21 AM
To: George Ou
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco and Vocera wireless LAN VoIP
devices don't check certificates
On 2/21/08, George Ou <george.ou@...hrepublic.com> wrote:
"I am also waiting for verification on Cisco's
wireless VoIP handsets. I heard that the Cisco devices have the same
design flaw, but it's fairly simple to confirm if you have one of those
wireless LAN VoIP handsets."
So you just generalize and make assumptions about a product based on
heresay? If the product is vulnerable, that's one thing. Go ahead and
write about it, but if you can't confirm the vulnerability of the
product, don't attempt to use a company to garner more attempts at
reading your article. Perhaps your title should have read. "I think
Cisco is vulnerable, but I don't know?" We all know Cisco is no better
than anyone else when it comes to bugs/issues, but don't just go making
assumptions and posts without proof. That's just sad journalism!
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists