full-disclosure - Re: Chinese backdoors "hidden in router firmware"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1f2d0e290803052129v69c1b65et5d80f37e508efb95@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:29:06 +0800
From: "Jerome Jar" <iusr.jar@...il.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Chinese backdoors "hidden in router firmware"

OK, only if hidden backdoors are also part of their function specs...

I have friends in a router manufacturer. Besides basic functionalities
that a router must have, they usually have to deal with some
ridiculous requirements from customers. Mmmm, I also start to suspect
the customers *want* their backdoors ;-)

On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:28 PM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:38:27 +0800, Jerome Jar said:
>  > Come on, where are the evidences? Sounds pretty much like racialism.
>  >
>  > Usually the engineers are having a hard time on even getting the
>  > routers and switches functional for mass market; there won't be any
>  > time left for them to plant well hidden backdoors.
>
>  But that's the proof right there - the reason *why* they have so much
>  trouble getting the damned things to work is because they have to work
>  around the backdoors in the device... ;)
>

-- 
"Houston, we have a problem."

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/